
Three terms now compete for the same line in AI engineering job descriptions. Prompt engineering is the established one. Loop engineering entered the AI vocabulary in late 2025 and dominated developer discussion through June 2026. Graph engineering followed roughly six weeks later. They get used interchangeably. Should they be? The three are not competing techniques. They are three different units of control, stacked. A prompt controls one model response. A loop controls one agent’s
Prompt engineering, loop engineering, and graph engineering are three different layers of control in AI systems, not competing techniques. Prompt engineering controls a single model response with human involvement at each step, while loop engineering automates a cycle where an agent observes, acts, and verifies without human intervention between steps. Graph engineering sits above both, controlling how multiple agents are organized and coordinated together, with routing rules determining retries and failures in advance. Each layer builds on the previous one without replacing it, addressing different problems: prompt engineering breaks down when tasks are high-volume or multi-step with no human available to evaluate outputs, while loop engineering cannot distinguish between completion and being stuck, and graph engineering handles cross-domain work with parallel branches.

Long-running agents accumulate state that no transcript captures. A coding agent at step 10 holds edited files, a running dev server, installed packages, and a warm prompt cache. When it misreads a traceback and rewrites a file that was already correct, neither available recovery path is cheap: patching forward grows the context and the token bill, and restarting from step one re-pays every model and tool call while reproducing nothing exactly, because runs are non-deterministic. Jumping back t

New AI toolbars and prompts are showing up in Google Docs and Gmail. If you don’t want Gemini’s help in writing documents and emails, here’s how to turn that stuff off.

In October 2025, a storm brewed over the Caribbean Sea. Weather models differed on its trajectory. Would it remain weak and end up in Haiti, or would it intensify and head to Jamaica? Artificial intelligence model WeatherNext, developed by Google’s DeepMind and Google Research, went with the latter. Five days before landfall, it predicted with 80 percent confidence that the storm system would hit Jamaica as a Category 5 hurricane. Hurricane Melissa was catastrophic, causing flooding and landslid
Want to go deeper than the news? Explore live, cohort-based AI courses taught by practitioners.
Browse AI courses on Maven