
Paolo Benanti tells WIRED that hysteria over whether godlike AI could destroy humanity is distracting from the need for public debate about how to govern the technology.
A Catholic Church advisor on artificial intelligence argues that major AI labs are engaging in "cartel" behavior by controlling the rules governing their industry and excluding the public from important decisions about the technology. He contends that warnings about superintelligent AI destroying humanity, while coming from researchers inside these labs, distract from the need for democratic regulation and public debate about how to constrain the companies building the technology. The advisor emphasizes that control standards should not be designed by the labs themselves, and that humans need meaningful control over the machines being developed. His concerns reflect the Pope's recent encyclical on AI, which warned against technocratic logic in the industry and called for international collaboration to ensure the technology serves the common good rather than geopolitical or commercial dominance.

As the US and China race to become the dominant power in the AI industry, the countries also appear to be figuring out ways to communicate on national security issues.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman discusses AI safety, human control, and international cooperation in remarks to the United Nations Security Council.

This week, the US and China, the two world leaders on AI, finally started talks meant to keep the whole world safe from emerging safety risks. But whether meetings between Donald Trump and Xi Jinping can lead to a reliable global governance framework for AI depends on how much the fierce rivals are actually willing to cooperate. It's clear Trump wants it to seem like discussions are going well. Before Trump and Xi meet on Thursday and Friday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced that both
Want to go deeper than the news? Explore live, cohort-based AI courses taught by practitioners.
Browse AI courses on Maven