Agent5Seven topics. One clear view.
Agent5

The latest AI news at a glance: seven topics, and a short, plain-English read on the stories. Free, no account.

Product
HomeHow it worksFAQAboutHow we fact-checkBlog
News
All newsModels & ReleasesFunding & DealsBenchmarksAgents & ProductsHardware & ComputePolicy & DramaRobotics
More
AdvertisePressPrivacyTerms
© 2026 Agent5
Agent5
Blog
Agent5
Blog
  1. Home›
  2. News›
  3. Policy & Drama›
  4. Pro-AI super PAC network underperforms in midterms
Models & Releases14Funding & Deals18Benchmarks9Agents & Products60Hardware & Compute23Policy & Drama38Robotics14
Policy & Drama

Pro-AI super PAC network underperforms in midterms

Wired AI: The Biggest Pro-AI Super Pac Network Didn't Really Impact the Midterms

Leading the Future, backed by Silicon Valley’s biggest billionaires, had a war chest of $100 million and an aggressive stance against AI regulation. All of it didn’t add up to much on Tuesday night.

Get smart on it

A major pro-AI super PAC network backed by Silicon Valley billionaires spent around $100 million during the midterm elections with the stated goal of opposing policies that restrict AI innovation. Despite this large war chest, the network's strategy to influence the election largely failed, as most of its funding went to safe candidates and it underperformed in riskier races where it attempted to shape outcomes. The network's shift away from aggressive spending coincided with polling showing widespread voter distrust of Big Tech, with exit polls indicating that a significant majority of voters said AI and data centers played a major role in their voting decisions. The election results were viewed as a victory for AI safety advocates, with voters from both parties supporting candidates who favored tech regulation and AI safety oversight.

Relevant courses

Want to go deeper than the news? Explore live, cohort-based AI courses taught by practitioners.

Browse AI courses on Maven →
Sources
Wired AI ↗
The biggest AI stories, once a day

One short email a day with the stories that matter. Free. Unsubscribe with one click.

Related news
Policy & DramaOpen story →

Big Tech claims voters’ AI backlash is “anti-Trump” not “anti-tech”

Donald Trump’s big, rapid American AI buildout now faces a major slowdown as voters in yesterday’s elections overwhelmingly supported candidates and measures that favored increasing restrictions on AI and data centers nationwide. One resource from a polling firm, called Redbud Consulting, tracked data center initiatives on the ballot and reported that out of 44 measures across 10 states seeking to restrict data centers, 38 passed so far. Those measures included dozens of moratoriums and bans. An

Policy & DramaOpen story →

Google will let schools disable its AI tools, but not without sacrificing Search

Schools choosing to restrict AI altogether will no longer be able to access Google Search, as AI features are now integrated into the search engine.

Also reported by The Verge, Ars Technica and Wired AI

Policy & DramaOpen story →

The New York Times sues Brave web browser for AI scraping and bypassing paywalls

The New York Times and a group of other publications have filed lawsuits against the company that makes the Brave web browser over alleged unlawful scraping to train AI and also letting users bypass their paywalls, as reported by Reuters. According to a complaint filed by the companies that run New York Daily News, the Chicago Tribune, and the Orlando Sentinel, Brave Software has monetized its index of scraped websites by, in part, providing AI companies with paid access to "r

Also reported by TechCrunch

Policy & DramaOpen story →

OpenAI is already trying to shape the 2028 election

OpenAI’s Chris Lehane wants AI to define the 2028 election, proposing a new social contract that could benefit Americans while also advancing the AI giant’s own business interests.

Policy & DramaOpen story →

Building on open source AI? Hugging Face’s policy chief on the costs, risks, and trade-offs

Open source models are becoming more mainstream as enterprises, governments and startups alike rely on the promise of lower costs, more control, and more flexibility. But as increasingly capable models become more freely available, how do companies capture value? And with Chinese open models gaining ground, can American players keep up?  On this episode of […]

Policy & DramaOpen story →

Anthropic warns that it’s very close to RSI capability, aka self-building AI

RSI is the point at which AI grows so good at training itself that it spawns a dramatic acceleration of AI capabilities. To the AI doomers, RSI represents the cataclysm from which there is no return.