
Wired AI: Here's Why You Shouldn't Use AI to Vote
From hallucinations to partisan bias, artificial intelligence chatbots like ChatGPT and Claude are not helpful when it comes to Election Day.
AI chatbots like those made by major tech companies are being used by millions of Americans to help decide how to vote, but research shows they frequently provide inaccurate election information. Studies found that nearly 40 percent of election answers from mainstream chatbots contained at least one factual error, and these tools often cite unreliable websites funded by political groups rather than legitimate news sources. The core problem is that chatbots rely on whatever information exists online, and when they do not know an answer, they tend to make things up rather than admit uncertainty. Experts warn that most Americans are unprepared to navigate elections using consumer AI tools, particularly because technology companies have overstated what these systems can reliably do.
Want to go deeper than the news? Explore live, cohort-based AI courses taught by practitioners.
Browse AI courses on Maven
The New York Times and a group of other publications have filed lawsuits against the company that makes the Brave web browser over alleged unlawful scraping to train AI and also letting users bypass their paywalls, as reported by Reuters. According to a complaint filed by the companies that run New York Daily News, the Chicago Tribune, and the Orlando Sentinel, Brave Software has monetized its index of scraped websites by, in part, providing AI companies with paid access to "r
Also reported by TechCrunch

Schools choosing to restrict AI altogether will no longer be able to access Google Search, as AI features are now integrated into the search engine.
Also reported by The Verge and Ars Technica

RSI is the point at which AI grows so good at training itself that it spawns a dramatic acceleration of AI capabilities. To the AI doomers, RSI represents the cataclysm from which there is no return.

WIRED uncovered some 400 apps and websites linked to Chinese-language developers that look like regular AI tools but had secret features that let users create violent AI-generated images and video.

An official extension for Anthropic’s Claude model was backdoored and threatened as many as 5,000 developers' machines, multiple sources reported Friday. Anthropic so far has yet to warn customers of the incident. The compromised package was a VS Code extension available in the marketplace of Cursor, a maker of AI-assisted developer tools, the company said Friday. The malicious version, 2.1.313, subsequently affected “at most 5,000 users,” presumably when they either downloaded it or their syste
Also reported by The Decoder
The other artificial intelligence shoe dropped this week, as Anthropic filed for what surely will be the second blockbuster AI initial public offering of stock this year. Nearly 70,000 words in the filing list a ton of risks, but in short, it’s making unimaginably huge bets on buying computing power, it’s uncertain on how long […] The post As Anthropic finally files for IPO, rising risks aren’t slowing the AI buildout – yet appeared first on SiliconANGLE.
Also reported by TechCrunch