Agent5Seven topics. One clear view.
Agent5

The latest AI news at a glance: seven topics, and a short, plain-English read on the stories. Free, no account.

Product
HomeHow it worksFAQAboutHow we fact-checkBlog
News
All newsModels & ReleasesFunding & DealsBenchmarksAgents & ProductsHardware & ComputePolicy & DramaRobotics
More
AdvertisePressPrivacyTerms
© 2026 Agent5
Agent5
Blog
Agent5
Blog
  1. Home›
  2. News›
  3. Benchmarks›
  4. Samaya Sterling beats Claude Fable 5.1 at 11x lower cost
Models & Releases24Funding & Deals22Benchmarks13Agents & Products67Hardware & Compute12Policy & Drama28Robotics7
Benchmarks

Samaya Sterling beats Claude Fable 5.1 at 11x lower cost

MarkTechPost: Samaya AI Releases Sterling: A 3B-Active Finance Research Agent Model that Beats Claude Fable 5.1 on FrontierFinance at 11x Lower Cost

Samaya AI has released Samaya Sterling, a post-trained model for agentic financial research. Sterling is built on NVIDIA’s Nemotron 3.5 Lightning, a 30B mixture-of-experts model with 3B active parameters. On Samaya’s FrontierFinance benchmark, it scores 58.9%. Claude Fable 5.1 scores 55.9%. Each Sterling question costs $0.61, against $6.89 for Fable 5.1. For developers, the takeaway is a concrete recipe: co-train a small model with its harness, and it can win in a narrow domain.

Get smart on it

Samaya AI released Sterling, a financial research model built on a base model with 30 billion total parameters but only 3 billion active parameters at any time. Sterling scored 58.9 percent on the FrontierFinance benchmark, outperforming Claude Fable 5.1's 55.9 percent while costing 11 times less per question: $0.61 versus $6.89. The model was trained using a combination of synthetic data and expert-written questions, then refined through multiple stages including supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning, with specialized helper models managing its research process. The key insight is that a smaller model tuned for a specific domain with the right supporting systems can outperform larger general-purpose models on that domain while dramatically reducing costs.

Explainer: Claude Fable 5.1 Explained: Price, Changes and the Ban Story

Relevant courses

Want to go deeper than the news? Explore live, cohort-based AI courses taught by practitioners.

Browse AI courses on Maven →
Sources
MarkTechPost ↗
The biggest AI stories, once a day

One short email a day with the stories that matter. Free. Unsubscribe with one click.

Related news
BenchmarksOpen story →

Mistral Says Its AI Model ‘Le Chonk’ Has Leapfrogged China in the Open-Weight Race

The French AI lab claims its latest release matches or outperforms even the best models from DeepSeek and Z.ai in coding and cybersecurity.

BenchmarksOpen story →

OpenAI announces three big science discoveries and a new way to work with academics

Less than a month after its mass release of hundreds of manuscripts that it said contained solutions to long-standing mathematics questions, OpenAI is back with three more "major" discoveries in math, computer science, and physics. What's different this time is the choice to have external experts that OpenAI describes as "shepherds" guiding the results in computer science and physics, while for the math problem it says that they advised it to release the AI output for researche

Also reported by The Decoder

BenchmarksOpen story →

WorldOracle Tests Whether World Models Can Reliably Predict Real-World Executions

Key Takeaways WorldOracle is a benchmark for action-conditioned world models (ACWMs) that scores each model’s predicted rollout against the paired real-world execution, with both starting from the same initial observations and following the same action sequence. Seven representative models were evaluated; arm motion was predicted relatively well, but object positions and movements often deviated from reality, and performance dropped over complete operation sequences. The platform opened t

BenchmarksOpen story →

Frontier AI labs say their models refuted the Exponential Time Hypothesis. What does that mean?

TechCrunch spoke to the MIT computer scientist charged with explaining OpenAI's latest mind-bending discovery

BenchmarksOpen story →

Working with academic communities to build scientific understanding

OpenAI shares model results on the Kakeya conjecture, Exponential Time Hypothesis, and quantum chromodynamics—and how researchers can verify and build on them.

BenchmarksOpen story →

Don’t assume composability in AI safety. Deployments need their own testing.

Practitioners know that a deployed system behaves differently from its base model, and that its behavior keeps changing as they change the system prompt, retrieval layers, fine-tuning, and so on. But safety evaluation often assumes the opposite, with teams citing the base model’s safety score from the system card for whatever they’ve done on top of the model. Many in the field end up holding both beliefs at once: expecting behavior to shift when they build on a model, yet basing purchasing and