Benchmarks

Exclusive: Paying for frontier AI models buys 4-month head start at 5x the cost

The performance gap between frontier AI models from US tech companies and the best open-weights models from Chinese companies has closed to just 4.4 months, according to a Mozilla report. That explains why many companies are shifting to the significantly cheaper open models for routine work—and helps reveal a narrow band of workloads where frontier models are worth the cost. Most organizations should ideally be using open models as the default for the majority of their work, according to the lat

Get smart on it

Open-source AI models from Chinese companies have closed the performance gap with expensive proprietary frontier models from US tech companies to just 4.4 months, while costing about one-fifth as much. This matters because many organizations can now use cheaper open models for routine work, reserving expensive closed models only for specialized tasks that would normally require human experts. The key insight is that closed frontier models provide value primarily for tasks lasting between 8 and 12 hours, where they maintain a meaningful capability advantage, but this lead shrinks every four months as open models improve. However, open models remain concentrated in Chinese hands while closed frontier models are dominated by US companies, raising concerns about which country may set global defaults for AI technology.

The biggest AI stories, once a day

One short email a day with the stories that matter. Free. Unsubscribe with one click.

Relevant courses

Want to go deeper than the news? Explore live, cohort-based AI courses taught by practitioners.

Browse AI courses on Maven
Related news
BenchmarksOpen story →

Google DeepMind just mathematically verified key parts of Signal

Google DeepMind researchers used agentic AI to mathematically prove, or “formally verify,” a number of the Signal protocol’s key cryptographic guarantees—a landmark development for the widely used cryptography and AI itself. Conducted as a sort of proof-of-concept project in just four weeks, the work is significant in two ways. It serves as further independent validation of the cryptography that protects massive quantities of the world's communications on platforms like the Signal app, Google Me

BenchmarksOpen story →

Baidu’s ERNIE Evolve Automated Research System Beats NanoChat and NanoGPT Records

Baidu has just released ERNIE Evolve, an automated research system that improves AI training and inference code. Given a repository, an objective and evaluation criteria, it picks research directions, edits code and runs experiments. Only changes that pass a hidden evaluator and a separate reviewer are kept. Baidu team tested the ERNIE Evolve automated research system on three public benchmarks. It then optimized inference for ERNIE-5.5-Flash, still in development. TL;DR Size: It is an

BenchmarksOpen story →

AI coding agents still need human cleanup on nearly three out of four tasks in a real-world test

Alibaba's new coding-agent benchmark, Co-Design Bench, tests AI agents on real user requests that already tripped them up in practice. Even GPT-6 Astra, the top performer, fully solves only 26.4 percent of tasks. On older benchmarks, the same models score above 99 percent. The article AI coding agents still need human cleanup on nearly three out of four tasks in a real-world test appeared first on The Decoder.

BenchmarksOpen story →

The gap between open and closed AI models in cyber capabilities keeps shrinking

In the Vals AI benchmark, OpenAI's GPT-6 Sol Daybreak hits 80.8 percent of attack objectives in simulated corporate networks. Worse, the open-weight model DeepSeek V4.1 Flash reaches 72.8 percent at a tenth of the cost. Because open models can no longer be restricted, analysts say the window for defenders is shrinking fast. The article The gap between open and closed AI models in cyber capabilities keeps shrinking appeared first on The Decoder.

BenchmarksOpen story →

Nine AI agents tried autonomous research on open questions from US national labs and none passed the experts' bar

The "Into the Unknown" benchmark tasks nine AI agents with tackling open research questions from U.S. national laboratories. None of the 135 submissions meets all requirements. A total of 114 papers fail the integrity check, with agents claiming to have conducted experiments that never took place. GPT-6 Astra performs best but still doesn't meet the experts' standards. The article Nine AI agents tried autonomous research on open questions from US national labs and none passed the expert

BenchmarksOpen story →

Ripple-65B Preview delivers strong agentic coding results as a fully Apache 2.0 open US model

Ricursive Intelligence is releasing Ripple-65B Preview, a 65-billion-parameter open-weight language model that the company says achieves the top score among open-source U.S. models on the TerminalBench 2.1 coding benchmark at a total R&D cost of $32 million. On other benchmarks, however, Ripple falls behind the likewise newly released western open model Inkling 2 Small. The article Ripple-65B Preview delivers strong agentic coding results as a fully Apache 2.0 open US model appeare