
Asking AI companies to self-regulate is a great way to pretend like you’ve accomplished something.
The article argues that asking AI companies to regulate themselves on safety issues is ineffective. The author uses a historical analogy: the automotive industry claimed to voluntarily adopt safety features like seat belts in the 1960s, when in reality evidence showed many lives could have been saved if such regulations had been mandatory earlier. By extension, the piece suggests that self-regulation by AI companies is a way to appear to address safety concerns without actually accomplishing meaningful progress.

Many frontier labs keep their risky research locked away. Trillium Labs wants to show off its work when it comes to self-improvement and model behavior.

For years these billionaires gushed obsessively about AI. But they meekly went along when Trump cancelled the term.

This week, the White House got nearly every major tech CEO in one room — Zuckerberg, Bezos, Musk, and Anthropic’s Dario Amodei among them — to sign an AI safety pledge that President Donald Trump called “morally binding.” Trump also signed an executive order officially rebranding AI as “super intelligence,” and meanwhile, Meta and OpenAI are putting friendlier faces on their AI products, even as the biggest money […]
Want to go deeper than the news? Explore live, cohort-based AI courses taught by practitioners.
Browse AI courses on Maven