
Just as new data centers face growing backlash from neighboring communities, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is about to make it harder for people to weigh in on any pollution those centers create. The EPA plans to toss out a federal rule requiring public notice and an opportunity to comment when certain industrial sites apply for an air permit. Advocates warn that the move would allow data center developers and other industries to break ground without giving nearb
The EPA is proposing to eliminate a federal requirement for public notice and comment periods when certain industrial sites, including data centers, apply for air pollution permits. This change would shift the responsibility for notifying the public to state and local agencies, which could choose not to inform residents about new pollution sources in their areas. The proposal matters because data centers increasingly face community opposition, and removing public participation requirements would allow facilities to begin construction without nearby residents knowing about or weighing in on potential pollution impacts. The permitting process in question, called New Source Review, has been in place since the 1970s and covers various industrial facilities, though the EPA classifies data centers under "minor" sources of pollution, a designation that environmental advocates dispute.

This week on Uncanny Valley, we dig into the latest prediction market buzz, Flock’s AI-powered police search tool, and how tech bros don’t know how to talk about “rouge” AI agents

Abliteration.AI is making powerful AI models without guardrails easier to access, arguing that giving defenders the same tools as bad actors could ultimately improve cybersecurity.

GPT-6 Astra is our most capable broadly deployed model and our first to reach the Critical level of cybersecurity capability under our Preparedness Framework.
Want to go deeper than the news? Explore live, cohort-based AI courses taught by practitioners.
Browse AI courses on Maven