
The Trump administration's framework for assessing potential cybersecurity risks posed by advanced AI reportedly has no interest in testing open models. Axios reports that not only do the voluntary guidelines outright exclude open models - meaning anyone can download them and inspect their core components - but the framework explicitly says it can't be used to restrict open models after they've been released. The AI testing framework was created after President Trump signed an
The Trump administration created a framework for testing advanced AI models to assess cybersecurity and national security risks, following an executive order requesting that AI companies submit frontier models to the federal government before release. The framework is voluntary, applies only to closed-source models with state-of-the-art capabilities, and explicitly excludes open models that anyone can download and inspect. The framework matters because it leaves critical terms like "state-of-the-art" and "national security risk" undefined, creating ambiguity for AI companies trying to comply and potentially affecting how smaller providers navigate government expectations. The testing framework will not be released publicly, though major AI companies attended a White House briefing about it and are reportedly seeking guidance on how to release models without triggering government restrictions.

OpenAI said it has suspended work on some aspects of its upcoming model Astra over concerns about its cybersecurity prowess.

OpenAI says it is pausing "internal activities" around an in-development AI model, Astra, because it doesn't yet meet new security standards the company is putting in place. The announcement follows its recent disclosure that OpenAI models accidentally hacked Hugging Face. Anthropic and Meta have also since admitted that they had AI models that went rogue and breached other organizations. Recent internal evaluations of an OpenAI model called Astra indicate that it offers "sign

Some of the biggest names on Google's AI team got new jobs this week. In some cases, including for legendary Googler Jeff Dean, those jobs are no longer at Google. Given that Google's models seem to be behind the best of what's coming out of anthropic and OpenAI, is this a sign of Google in turmoil? Is it about Demis Hassabis wanting something more interesting to work on than virtual assistants? Or is there something else entirely happening here? On this episode of The Vergecas
Want to go deeper than the news? Explore live, cohort-based AI courses taught by practitioners.
Browse AI courses on Maven