
OpenAI outlines a “reverse federalism” approach to AI governance, where state laws help build a national framework for safe, democratic AI.
States are passing similar AI safety laws that establish a shared regulatory baseline, a process described as "reverse federalism" that is moving the country toward a unified national standard. The federal government is developing its own testing framework for advanced AI systems, particularly for cybersecurity applications. These efforts matter because a consistent national approach is presented as preferable to a patchwork of different state rules, which could slow innovation and create confusion for developers and regulators. The alignment between state legislation in California, New York, and Illinois around core elements like safety documentation, incident reporting, and independent audits is described as laying groundwork for both a US national framework and a potential global approach to AI governance.

The City Attorney’s Office sent the tech giants cease-and-desist letters this week telling them to stop profiting from 13 “face-swap” apps that are overwhelmingly used to target women and girls.

On today’s Uncanny Valley, we unpack OpenAI’s ongoing drama, both legal and reputational, and whether these developments could further hurt the company—particularly in its fight against Anthropic.

The company endorsed landmark AI transparency laws in California and New York last year, but its head of US state and local policy says they may already be outdated.
Want to go deeper than the news? Explore live, cohort-based AI courses taught by practitioners.
Browse AI courses on Maven