
Platforms are finally recognizing that people don’t want to consume AI slop. A growing number of sites and apps now have tools and policies to flag, label, and ban AI-generated content.
People are increasingly rejecting generative AI features in their daily lives, and some major technology platforms are beginning to respond by adding tools to flag, label, and restrict AI-generated content. The backlash stems from widespread frustration that AI was integrated into software without user consent, including the scraping of personal data for model training and the enabling of deepfakes. Recent examples show that public pressure has successfully forced some companies to roll back unpopular AI features within days, while others face criticism for using AI-generated materials in marketing and data center construction. Experts note that collective action and organizing, both online and through traditional methods, has demonstrated the ability to influence corporate decisions around AI deployment.

When Twitch announced that streamers could opt out, thousands of users questioned why their content was being used to train AI models in the first place.

Tim O’Reilly built a publishing empire that AI is helping to destroy. Yet he loves AI—as long as it’s open source.

A judge has identified what appears to be the first time a US plaintiff has attempted to hide text in court filings that only an artificial intelligence system can read in a bid to win a case. In a decision published last week, Connecticut judge Walter Spader Jr. confirmed that the hidden text had no impact in a case where a man alleged a healthcare provider was improperly withholding access to records. The court weighed his filing on the merits, Spader said, but nevertheless, the attempted atta
Want to go deeper than the news? Explore live, cohort-based AI courses taught by practitioners.
Browse AI courses on Maven