
Is Anthropic's new watermarking system a travesty? Some have taken to social media to complain that it is.
Anthropic has added invisible watermarks to outputs from its Claude chatbot to mark content as AI-generated, a policy implemented to comply with EU regulations requiring AI-generated content to be labeled. Some Claude users are upset about the watermarks, arguing they will be caught using the tool at work or school, though critics of this complaint note that responsible use of AI tools would not involve copying and pasting outputs verbatim. Other users support the watermarking system as a necessary way to detect AI-generated content and prevent deception, while some opponents argue the practice is hypocritical given how AI models trained on others' work.

When Twitch announced that streamers could opt out, thousands of users questioned why their content was being used to train AI models in the first place.

Tim O’Reilly built a publishing empire that AI is helping to destroy. Yet he loves AI—as long as it’s open source.

A judge has identified what appears to be the first time a US plaintiff has attempted to hide text in court filings that only an artificial intelligence system can read in a bid to win a case. In a decision published last week, Connecticut judge Walter Spader Jr. confirmed that the hidden text had no impact in a case where a man alleged a healthcare provider was improperly withholding access to records. The court weighed his filing on the merits, Spader said, but nevertheless, the attempted atta
Want to go deeper than the news? Explore live, cohort-based AI courses taught by practitioners.
Browse AI courses on Maven