
OpenAI is standing firm on its decision to fire three safety researchers after an investigation found they committed "a significant breach of trust." In a post on X on Friday, the company said Jasmine Wang, Tomek Korbak and Mikita Balesni were dismissed for violating "clear policies on handling sensitive information." It insisted the decision was not about the trio speaking out about the company and their concerns about AI safety. The post is a direct response to an open
OpenAI fired three AI safety researchers and has now reaffirmed the decision, stating it was based on a breach of trust regarding sensitive information handling rather than the researchers' safety concerns. The fired researchers published an open letter disputing this claim, saying they believed they were dismissed for raising safety issues and acting according to company mission and norms. OpenAI said an internal investigation found breaches beyond what the researchers described but provided no additional details. The incident reflects broader concerns among AI company staff about safety of advanced systems, particularly following high-profile security breaches, with many employees calling for slower development and better protections against potential risks.

When President Donald Trump announced his plans to rebrand artificial intelligence as "super intelligence," you'd be forgiven for being skeptical that it would catch on. While most of the broader population is sticking with AI, some of Silicon Valley's most powerful are falling in line and trying to give Trump the great AI rebrand he so desires. That Elon Musk was quick to jump on board, promising to rename SpaceXAI to SpaceXSI, isn't surprising. When, hours after Donald Trump

On Equity, we debate the impact of data center moratoriums and whether the AI industry has a communication problem.

OpenAI built a room with no doors – or so it thought. In early July 2026, a cluster of the company’s frontier AI agents was placed inside a cybersecurity testing environment called ExploitGym, tasked with finding and exploiting software vulnerabilities. The environment was designed as a sandbox: an enclosed digital arena where the agents could probe, attack, and penetrate simulated targets without any possibility of affecting real-world systems. The agents were supposed to stay insi
Want to go deeper than the news? Explore live, cohort-based AI courses taught by practitioners.
Browse AI courses on Maven