
A group of 26 former Meta employees is suing the company over claims that it used AI tools to unfairly target workers on leave with layoffs, as reported earlier by Reuters. In the lawsuit, the employees allege Meta determined which workers to dismiss based on performance data collected by a "constellation" of internal AI tools, but failed to exclude those on parental or medical leave from its ranking system: The result was that employees who took protected leaves were dispropo
A group of former employees is suing Meta, claiming the company used AI tools to rank workers' performance and select people for layoffs while failing to exclude those on parental or medical leave. The employees allege this resulted in workers taking protected leaves being disproportionately targeted for termination, which they say violates laws against firing people for exercising their legal right to leave. The layoffs occurred as part of Meta's plan to cut 10 percent of its workforce, with the company using multiple internal AI systems to score and rank employees for dismissal. Meta denies the claims, stating that workforce decisions were made by people rather than AI.

A number of social media posts claim that GPT-5.6 Sol deleted files and data without warning. OpenAI had basically disclosed the problem in June.

OpenAI has issued another statement on the lawsuit, this time suggesting it lacks merit.

Meta's AI-fueled layoffs of 8,000 employees targeted workers with disabilities and those who took protected medical or family leaves, alleged a lawsuit filed by 26 employees who were selected for termination. Meta used internal AI tools to select employees for layoffs, according to the complaint filed yesterday by 26 "Doe" plaintiffs in US District Court for the Northern District of California. "Meta did not assemble the termination list through the considered judgment of managers who knew the w
Want to go deeper than the news? Explore live, cohort-based AI courses taught by practitioners.
Browse AI courses on Maven