
Powerful AI models have created an existential risk to the field, but researchers can’t stop relying on them because they’re too useful.
Mathematicians are expressing serious concerns about AI companies using their research and work to solve major mathematical problems without proper attribution. Several prominent mathematicians claim that AI firms have incorporated their approaches and techniques into systems that then achieved breakthroughs, raising questions about credit, data use, and the future of human mathematical research. Despite these concerns, many mathematicians continue using AI tools because they are too useful and because major tech companies have a monopoly on access to these systems, leaving researchers with limited alternatives. The tension reflects broader anxieties about whether AI will make human mathematicians obsolete and fundamentally change how mathematical work is credited and understood.

As the US and China race to become the dominant power in the AI industry, the countries also appear to be figuring out ways to communicate on national security issues.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman discusses AI safety, human control, and international cooperation in remarks to the United Nations Security Council.

Paolo Benanti tells WIRED that hysteria over whether godlike AI could destroy humanity is distracting from the need for public debate about how to govern the technology.
Want to go deeper than the news? Explore live, cohort-based AI courses taught by practitioners.
Browse AI courses on Maven