
Recently, a man I was rock climbing with told me about how he'd used AI to make a motivational poster for himself, which he'd hung on his bedroom wall: a bear, walking a slackline over a canyon, holding a sign that said, "Do cool shit." I made what I hoped was a polite noise. What reaction was this man looking for? He probably hoped someone, maybe me, would say it was cool or inspiring. It seemed I was not the first person he'd told about this poster. "You know, it's funny," he
A tech industry leader recently published a lengthy essay outlining a positive vision for AI's future, arguing against widespread pessimism about the technology. The essay proposes that AI personal agents will improve human lives by managing relationships, health, careers, and other aspects of daily existence. This matters because the technology has faced significant backlash due to concerns about job losses, energy consumption, and safety risks. The source text questions whether AI-generated content and AI-managed relationships can truly provide meaningful value compared to human effort and personal connection.

When Twitch announced that streamers could opt out, thousands of users questioned why their content was being used to train AI models in the first place.

Tim O’Reilly built a publishing empire that AI is helping to destroy. Yet he loves AI—as long as it’s open source.

A judge has identified what appears to be the first time a US plaintiff has attempted to hide text in court filings that only an artificial intelligence system can read in a bid to win a case. In a decision published last week, Connecticut judge Walter Spader Jr. confirmed that the hidden text had no impact in a case where a man alleged a healthcare provider was improperly withholding access to records. The court weighed his filing on the merits, Spader said, but nevertheless, the attempted atta
Want to go deeper than the news? Explore live, cohort-based AI courses taught by practitioners.
Browse AI courses on Maven