
"Exactly what that dialog looked like between the government and Anthropic and OpenAI is unclear."
OpenAI is releasing a new advanced language model for public access, but the government approval process for how it decided the model was safe remains unclear to outside observers and experts. Multiple researchers and policy figures have stated they do not understand what the requirements are for getting government approval to release frontier models, or which agencies are responsible for evaluating them. An executive order laid out a roadmap for evaluating frontier models, but the specifics have not been filled in, and six cabinet agencies have been instructed to determine a final process by early August. The lack of transparency about safety evaluations raises concerns about whether true safety experts are playing enough of a role in the model release process, and whether decisions depend too heavily on personal connections between company leaders and administration officials.

OpenAI is facing calls for "serious sanctions" after fighting to keep news organizations from snooping through millions of logs to find evidence of users skirting their paywalls by prompting ChatGPT to regurgitate their articles. This evidence is considered among the most important to both sides, potentially either dooming OpenAI as an infringer or exonerating its chatbot technology as a transformative fair use of news sites' content. In a sanctions motion Thursday, news organizations suing Open

News publishers say OpenAI hid tools and datasets that could identify copyrighted journalism in ChatGPT outputs, escalating their lawsuit with a new motion for sanctions.

Meta's new AI image generator is using your public Instagram photos unless you opt out. Here's how to do that.
Want to go deeper than the news? Explore live, cohort-based AI courses taught by practitioners.
Browse AI courses on Maven