
We spoke with several cybersecurity researchers, who look for unknown vulnerabilities and develop tools to exploit them, about how OpenAI’s and Anthropic’s guardrails affect their work.
AI companies have created safety guardrails and vetted access programs to prevent malicious hackers from misusing their models for cyberattacks. However, these same restrictions are now blocking legitimate offensive cybersecurity researchers who need AI tools to find vulnerabilities and develop exploits before criminals do. Security researchers argue that AI companies are making arbitrary decisions about what is safe, and that defensive and offensive cybersecurity work often require the same capabilities, making the restrictions counterproductive. Some researchers respond by using open-source AI models without guardrails, while others avoid using AI for sensitive vulnerability work altogether due to concerns about data security and the inconsistency of the restrictions.

A running look — in reverse chronological order — at the bigger tech companies that have announced significant layoffs this year with AI as a stated factor.

At libraries around the country, "Avoiding AI" workshops have elicited unprecedented demand.

Plus: Russian hackers are trying to steal US nuclear scientists’ emails, the State Department bans known scammers from entering the United States, and more.
Want to go deeper than the news? Explore live, cohort-based AI courses taught by practitioners.
Browse AI courses on Maven