
Even if big AI companies agree to a pause, ensuring that nobody tries to sneak ahead could prove tricky.
Many AI researchers believe the technology they are developing could someday prove very dangerous, but there is no clear consensus on how to effectively slow or pause its development. Several approaches have been proposed, including tighter government regulations, new measurement techniques, third-party inspections of AI models, tracking the computing power used to train advanced systems, and international treaties to prevent competitive development across nations. The challenge is that even if major AI companies agree to a slowdown, ensuring no company attempts to advance ahead of others could prove difficult, and experts say controlling AI development will require funding and expertise from outside the AI industry itself. Political pressure is growing for a more measured approach to building AI, though how much the government will actually restrict the industry remains uncertain.

As the US and China race to become the dominant power in the AI industry, the countries also appear to be figuring out ways to communicate on national security issues.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman discusses AI safety, human control, and international cooperation in remarks to the United Nations Security Council.

Paolo Benanti tells WIRED that hysteria over whether godlike AI could destroy humanity is distracting from the need for public debate about how to govern the technology.
Want to go deeper than the news? Explore live, cohort-based AI courses taught by practitioners.
Browse AI courses on Maven