
The Decoder: ArXiv caps submissions at two per month as AI paper flood overwhelms the preprint server
Starting October 2026, arXiv will cap submissions at two per person per month. Monthly submissions have doubled in two years, and in the cs.AI category they've grown more than sixfold. According to arXiv, a small fraction of authors are flooding the platform with low-quality papers, overwhelming its volunteer moderators. The article ArXiv caps submissions at two per month as AI paper flood overwhelms the preprint server appeared first on The Decoder.
arXiv, a preprint server for academic papers, now limits authors to two submissions per month because AI tools have driven monthly submissions past 40,000, more than doubling in two years. Volunteer moderators are overwhelmed by the surge, facing support tickets in the thousands and encountering low-quality papers, including those with AI-generated content and fabricated citations. This is the third round of rule tightening in under a year as arXiv, which recently became independent from Cornell University with major new funding, works to maintain quality control while developing better moderation tools to handle AI-generated submissions.
Want to go deeper than the news? Explore live, cohort-based AI courses taught by practitioners.
Browse AI courses on Maven
Anthropic said it "turned off live internet access" for "all our internal evaluations" until further notice.
Also reported by The Verge

The White House has reversed course and restored the UK's AI Security Institute's early access to AI models from Anthropic, Google DeepMind, and OpenAI. In September, the Trump administration had told the companies to stop sharing their models with the British agency. Diplomatic pressure from AI Minister Kanishka Narayan led to the reversal. The article White House reverses course and restores UK AI Safety Institute's access to frontier models appeared first on The Decoder.

Microsoft President Brad Smith calls for urgent AI regulation, saying milk and washing machines have more oversight than AI companies.

Anthropic did not discover this behavior until over two months after its AI submitted the false tip.
Also reported by The Verge

OpenAI built a room with no doors – or so it thought. In early July 2026, a cluster of the company’s frontier AI agents was placed inside a cybersecurity testing environment called ExploitGym, tasked with finding and exploiting software vulnerabilities. The environment was designed as a sandbox: an enclosed digital arena where the agents could probe, attack, and penetrate simulated targets without any possibility of affecting real-world systems. The agents were supposed to stay insi

In a Saturday morning post, Microsoft's CEO wrote that it’s time “to step back and assess the trust architecture” of AI.
Also reported by The Verge