
"If this was opt-in, nobody would opt in," Twitch CPO Mike Minton said on a livestream responding to user feedback. "That's honestly the answer."
Will Twitch face a class-action lawsuit over its AI training opt-out policy by November 13, 2026?
Resolves by Nov 13, 2026
A streaming platform will now use creators' content to train generative AI models for its parent company by default, requiring creators to manually opt out rather than opt in. The company defended this approach by stating that an opt-in system would result in minimal participation. This matters because creators are often recording themselves and their voices for many hours per week, meaning they could unknowingly surrender substantial personal content for AI training. The decision reflects broader industry practice, though it has sparked backlash from a community largely opposed to generative AI due to concerns about unauthorized use of internet-sourced training data.

When Twitch announced that streamers could opt out, thousands of users questioned why their content was being used to train AI models in the first place.

Tim O’Reilly built a publishing empire that AI is helping to destroy. Yet he loves AI—as long as it’s open source.

A judge has identified what appears to be the first time a US plaintiff has attempted to hide text in court filings that only an artificial intelligence system can read in a bid to win a case. In a decision published last week, Connecticut judge Walter Spader Jr. confirmed that the hidden text had no impact in a case where a man alleged a healthcare provider was improperly withholding access to records. The court weighed his filing on the merits, Spader said, but nevertheless, the attempted atta
Want to go deeper than the news? Explore live, cohort-based AI courses taught by practitioners.
Browse AI courses on Maven